See Tow Soo Ling

See Tow Soo Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and arbitration. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 63% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated expertise across 68 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deputyship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenants-in-common	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lasting Power of Attorney	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
LPA Revocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chinese Customary Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Sale Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administration of Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Companies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deputyship Applications	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Powers of Attorney	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Tow Soo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

See Tow Soo Ling has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	6 cases	38% of cases	TBZ v TCA: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Maintenance for Adult Children(Jul 2017) Wong Swee Hor v Tan Jip Seng: Intestate Succession & Chinese Customary Marriage(Dec 2014) Lo Man Heng v UBS AG: Breach of Mandate & Unauthorised Payments(Jul 2014)
CNPLaw LLP	5 cases	31% of cases	WLR v WLT: Costs Allocation in Mental Capacity Act Proceedings for P's Deputyship and LPA Revocation(May 2024) WLR v WLT: Deputyship & LPA Revocation under Mental Capacity Act(May 2023) SpaceSATS Pte Ltd v Chan Chia Sern: Contempt of Court & Disobedience of Order(Feb 2023)
Colin Ng & Partners	5 cases	31% of cases	Jiangsu Overseas Group v. Concord Energy: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Lack of Jurisdiction in Green Petroleum Coke Contracts(Aug 2016) Quality Assurance Management Asia v Zhang Qing: Employee's Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation(May 2013) Strandore Invest A/S v Soh Kim Wat: Enforcement of Arbitration Award Dispute(Jun 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of See Tow Soo Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 10 (63%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.0 parties avg	3.0	31%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Partial	44.8 parties avg	4.8	25%
Won	64.2 parties avg	4.2	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	43.6 parties avg	3.6
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2024	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of See Tow Soo Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(31%)	31%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	4(25%)	25%
Won	6(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	185,562.10	16,869.2811 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WLR v WLT: Costs Allocation in Mental Capacity Act Proceedings for P's Deputyship and LPA Revocation 02 May 2024 WLT (Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	02 May 2024	WLT (Defendant, Plaintiff): Costs to be paid by PCosts fixed at $20,000 inclusive of disbursements, to be paid by P to W for OSM 3. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	WLR v WLT: Deputyship & LPA Revocation under Mental Capacity Act 10 May 2023 WLU (Defendant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	10 May 2023	WLU (Defendant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Application granted in partApplication to be appointed as deputy granted in part.
3	SpaceSATS Pte Ltd v Chan Chia Sern: Contempt of Court & Disobedience of Order 20 Feb 2023 SpaceSATS Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	20 Feb 2023	SpaceSATS Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; costs of both applications fixed at $15,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by Dr Chan to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tan Ngiap Tong v Tan Ngep Hong: Dispute over Sale of Land Agreement 26 Sep 2021 Tan Ngiap Tong (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Sep 2021	Tan Ngiap Tong (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for wrongful repudiation of the agreement and damages was dismissed.
5	Darcet Pte Ltd v Schweizer Energy Production: Misrepresentation & Oral Contract Dispute 29 Jan 2020 Darcet Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Jan 2020	Darcet Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay the defendants' costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	TBZ v TCA: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Maintenance for Adult Children 27 Jul 2017 TBZ (Plaintiff)Neutral	27 Jul 2017	TBZ (Plaintiff): Assets divided equallyThe court ordered an equal division of matrimonial assets. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Jiangsu Overseas Group v. Concord Energy: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Lack of Jurisdiction in Green Petroleum Coke Contracts 09 Aug 2016 Jiangsu Overseas Group Co., Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Aug 2016	Jiangsu Overseas Group Co., Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissed with costsApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed with costs of $10,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Wong Swee Hor v Tan Jip Seng: Intestate Succession & Chinese Customary Marriage 15 Dec 2014 Wong Swee Hor (Plaintiff)Won	15 Dec 2014	Wong Swee Hor (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedClaim that Mdm Wong is the lawful wife of Mr Tan was allowed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Lo Man Heng v UBS AG: Breach of Mandate & Unauthorised Payments 09 Jul 2014 Yap Loo Mien (Third Party)Won	09 Jul 2014	Yap Loo Mien (Third Party): Claim DismissedThe defendant's claim against the third party was dismissed.
10	Quality Assurance Management Asia v Zhang Qing: Employee's Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation 02 May 2013 Quality Assurance Management Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	02 May 2013	Quality Assurance Management Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $70,562.10 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Strandore Invest A/S v Soh Kim Wat: Enforcement of Arbitration Award Dispute 09 Jun 2010 LKE Electric Europe A/S (Applicant)Won	09 Jun 2010	LKE Electric Europe A/S (Applicant): Leave to enforce Final Award grantedLeave granted to enforce the Final Award (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Strandore Invest A/S v Soh Kim Wat: Enforcement of Arbitration Award & Public Policy 13 May 2010 MS Invest Odense A/S (Applicant)Won	13 May 2010	MS Invest Odense A/S (Applicant): Leave to enforce the Final Award grantedThe applicant was granted leave to enforce the Final Award.
13	Ng Koo Kay Benedict v Zim Integrated: Defamation Claim over Press Release 08 Feb 2010 Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Feb 2010	Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded to both plaintiffs in the total amount of $70,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Elitegroup v Kobian: Stay of Execution Pending Amended Counterclaim for False Representation 31 Jan 2010 Elitegroup Computer Systems Co, Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	31 Jan 2010	Elitegroup Computer Systems Co, Ltd (Plaintiff): Applications grantedApplications granted; costs of application awarded to plaintiff to be agreed or taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Chow Kwok Ching v Chow Kwok Chi: Oppression, Family Business, and Companies Act 25 Jun 2008 Chow Kwok Ching (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Jun 2008	Chow Kwok Ching (Plaintiff): Partial VictoryPlaintiff succeeded in his case, but was only entitled to recover 65% of his costs from the first and second defendants. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Lee Tung Co: Winding Up Application by Non-Minority Shareholder on Just and Equitable Grounds 21 Nov 2007 Chow Kwok Ching (Respondent)Lost	21 Nov 2007	Chow Kwok Ching (Respondent): Opposition unsuccessfulChow Kwok Ching opposed the winding up application, but the court granted the order.