Seetha Ramasamy

Seetha Ramasamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and limitation. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Seetha Ramasamy has demonstrated expertise across 5 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and limitation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	2 cases	29% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Seetha Ramasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 29% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	29% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Seetha Ramasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 29% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Seetha Ramasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Seetha Ramasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Seetha Ramasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Seetha Ramasamy has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	2 cases	67% of cases	Tan Kim Seng v Ibrahim Victor Adam: Automatic Discontinuance After Interlocutory Judgment(Nov 2003) Ibrahim v Tan Kim Seng: Discontinuance of Action for Delay in Damages Assessment(Jul 2003)
Tan Kok Quan Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	United Overseas Bank Ltd v Ishak bin Ismail: Appeal Dismissed for Irregular Service of Statutory Demand in Bankruptcy Case(Aug 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Seetha Ramasamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Seetha Ramasamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Kim Seng v Ibrahim Victor Adam: Automatic Discontinuance After Interlocutory Judgment 20 Nov 2003 Tan Kim Seng (Appellant, Defendant)Won	20 Nov 2003	Tan Kim Seng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the action is deemed discontinued pursuant to O 21 r 2(6). Costs awarded to the appellant, restricted to the application of O 21 r 2. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	United Overseas Bank Ltd v Ishak bin Ismail: Appeal Dismissed for Irregular Service of Statutory Demand in Bankruptcy Case 06 Aug 2003 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Appellant)Lost	06 Aug 2003	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the dismissal of the bankruptcy petition was dismissed.
3	Ibrahim v Tan Kim Seng: Discontinuance of Action for Delay in Damages Assessment 17 Jul 2003 Tan Kim Seng trading as Hock Huat Engineering (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	17 Jul 2003	Tan Kim Seng trading as Hock Huat Engineering (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.