Sega Param

Sega Param is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in mental capacity law and rectification.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sega Param has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and chancery and equity.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Rectification	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Land Titles Act	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sega Param has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sega Param has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Vision Law LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Nathan v De Silva: Rectification of Property Transfer Executed by Unauthorized Committee of Person(Apr 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sega Param's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sega Param's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nathan v De Silva: Rectification of Property Transfer Executed by Unauthorized Committee of Person 17 Apr 2016 Peter Edward Nathan (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Apr 2016	Peter Edward Nathan (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for an order for the contract for the sale of the Flat to be perfected with the registration of the Transfer with SLA was dismissed.