Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy

Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Regime	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Reopening of concluded criminal appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	80% of cases	Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Material Witness Disclosure, and Bailment of Drugs(Nov 2021) Parthiban v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Importation Conviction and Sentencing(Aug 2021) Public Prosecutor v Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj: Importation of Cannabis and Statutory Offences(Feb 2021)
Attorney–General’s Chambers	1 cases	20% of cases	Ahmed Salim v Public Prosecutor: Diminished Responsibility & Premeditated Murder(Jan 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Senthilkumaran s/o Sabapathy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ahmed Salim v Public Prosecutor: Diminished Responsibility & Premeditated Murder 18 Jan 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Jan 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction and sentence.
2	Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Material Witness Disclosure, and Bailment of Drugs 10 Nov 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Nov 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Roshdi's conviction and sentence.
3	Parthiban v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Importation Conviction and Sentencing 02 Aug 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Aug 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence.
4	Public Prosecutor v Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj: Importation of Cannabis and Statutory Offences 23 Feb 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Feb 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Public Prosecutor won the case, securing a conviction against the defendant.
5	Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Criminal Appeal & Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's criminal motion.