Shahiran Ibrahim

Shahiran Ibrahim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-Competition Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Music Publishing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Royalties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Expert Determination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shahiran Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shahiran Ibrahim has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Asia Law Corporation	4 cases	57% of cases	Goh Rosaline v Goh Lian Chyu: Will Construction & Right to Occupy Property with Pets(May 2019) Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Exclusive Distributorship Termination Dispute(Jul 2008) Paillart v Eban: Dispute over Director Removal and Company Control in Earth Science Industries Pte Ltd(Oct 2006)
Samuel Seow Law Corporation	2 cases	29% of cases	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Breach of Contract & Non-Competition Clause Dispute(May 2009) Chua Chian Ya v Music & Movements: Copyright Ownership Dispute over Compositions(Mar 2009)
Jeffrey Soh & Co	1 cases	14% of cases	Wellform Construction v Lay Sing: Joint Venture Accounting Dispute(Jan 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shahiran Ibrahim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	57%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shahiran Ibrahim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	580,576.79	116,115.365 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goh Rosaline v Goh Lian Chyu: Will Construction & Right to Occupy Property with Pets 26 May 2019 Low Djau Ai (Defendant)Lost	26 May 2019	Low Djau Ai (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was allowed, meaning the defendant's objection was unsuccessful. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Breach of Contract & Non-Competition Clause Dispute 31 May 2009 Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	31 May 2009	Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Sports Connection was successful in its appeal against the High Court's decision. The court also awarded costs of the present appeal as well as three quarters of its costs in the court below. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chua Chian Ya v Music & Movements: Copyright Ownership Dispute over Compositions 30 Mar 2009 Chua Chian Ya (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Mar 2009	Chua Chian Ya (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application for a declaration was dismissed, and she was ordered to pay costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Sports Connection v Deuter Sports: Exclusive Distributorship Termination Dispute 09 Jul 2008 Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Jul 2008	Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for wrongful repudiation of the Letter of Agreement was dismissed.
5	Paillart v Eban: Dispute over Director Removal and Company Control in Earth Science Industries Pte Ltd 29 Oct 2006 Eban Stuart Ashley (Defendant)Lost	29 Oct 2006	Eban Stuart Ashley (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant; injunction issued restraining him from removing the first plaintiff as a director. Damages to be assessed by the Registrar and interest thereon to be fixed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Evergreat Construction v Presscrete Engineering: Expert Determination & Prevention Principle in Construction Dispute 07 Dec 2005 Presscrete Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 Dec 2005	Presscrete Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe independent assessor awarded the defendant $357,638.36 for the unpaid balance of the invoices issued for works carried out. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Wellform Construction v Lay Sing: Joint Venture Accounting Dispute 12 Jan 2001 Wellform Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	12 Jan 2001	Wellform Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Lay Sing is to pay Wellform Construction $222,938.43 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of Writ of Summons until the day before judgment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).