Shankar Kumar

Shankar Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contracts and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shankar Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Transactions	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Orders	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shankar Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shankar Kumar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	50% of cases	Bonsel Development v Tan Kong Kar: Condition Precedent & Property Sale(Aug 2000)
Salem Ibrahim and Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order(Aug 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shankar Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	50%
Won	18.0 parties avg	8.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shankar Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order 03 Aug 2005 Mark Justin Baile (Defendant)Neutral	03 Aug 2005	Mark Justin Baile (Defendant): Original orders to stand, while preserving their respective positions pending the trialThe parties have reached an agreement to allow the original orders to stand, while preserving their respective positions pending the trial. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Bonsel Development v Tan Kong Kar: Condition Precedent & Property Sale 23 Aug 2000 Another (Respondent)Lost	23 Aug 2000	Another (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.