Shanmugam Manohar

Shanmugam Manohar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in automobile accidents and negligence. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shanmugam Manohar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shanmugam Manohar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
K Krishna & Partners	2 cases	100% of cases	Stansfield Group v Acies Law: Taxation of Solicitor's Bills of Costs Dispute(Oct 2010) Ari bin Abdullah v Ong Chwee Siew: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Admissibility of Criminal Conviction in Civil Proceedings(Jan 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shanmugam Manohar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shanmugam Manohar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Stansfield Group v Acies Law: Taxation of Solicitor's Bills of Costs Dispute 07 Oct 2010 The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd (trading as Stansfield College (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Oct 2010	The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd (trading as Stansfield College (Plaintiff): Application dismissed in partApplication to tax the first two bills was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ari bin Abdullah v Ong Chwee Siew: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Admissibility of Criminal Conviction in Civil Proceedings 28 Jan 2007 Farida bte Umar (administratrix of the estate of Mohd Hussin bin Ismail, deceased) (Plaintiff, Third Party)Won	28 Jan 2007	Farida bte Umar (administratrix of the estate of Mohd Hussin bin Ismail, deceased) (Plaintiff, Third Party): Judgment for PlaintiffFarida’s claim for damages with respect to Hussin’s death succeeds with costs; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).