Shanti Jaganathan

Shanti Jaganathan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and knowing receipt. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fraud and deceit and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shanti Jaganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shanti Jaganathan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	2 cases	67% of cases	Zage v Ho: Knowing Receipt, Breach of Trust, and Solicitor Misappropriation(Feb 2010) Agrosin Pte Ltd v Martynov Igor: Breach of Director's Duties, Understated Costs, and Unpaid Salary Dispute(Jun 2009)
Ong & Lau	1 cases	33% of cases	Choo Pheng Soon v Public Prosecutor: Forgery, Fabricating False Evidence, and Criminal Procedure(Jan 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shanti Jaganathan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	23.3 parties avg	3.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shanti Jaganathan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	863,950.71	431,975.362 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Zage v Ho: Knowing Receipt, Breach of Trust, and Solicitor Misappropriation 09 Feb 2010 Kaori Kathleen Zage (Appellant)Partial	09 Feb 2010	Kaori Kathleen Zage (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; DeFred is liable to account to the appellants as trustee for the sum transferred in the Cash Cheque ie, $270,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Agrosin Pte Ltd v Martynov Igor: Breach of Director's Duties, Understated Costs, and Unpaid Salary Dispute 25 Jun 2009 Martynov Igor (Defendant)Partial	25 Jun 2009	Martynov Igor (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim for unpaid salary allowed with interest at 5.33% from 29 March 2007. The currency is SGD as the salary was claimed in SGD.
3	Choo Pheng Soon v Public Prosecutor: Forgery, Fabricating False Evidence, and Criminal Procedure 21 Jan 2001 Choo Pheng Soon (Appellant)Lost	21 Jan 2001	Choo Pheng Soon (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced.