Sharmila Sanjeevi

Sharmila Sanjeevi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and collective sales. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Invoices	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sharmila Sanjeevi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sharmila Sanjeevi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Legis Point LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Barun Electronics v. EZY Infotech: Summary Judgment for Unpaid Invoices Dispute(Jul 2020) Aavanti Offshore v Bab Al Khail: Validity of Security Interests and Debit Notes Dispute(Mar 2020)
Donaldson & Burkinshaw LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Teo Mei Ling Karen v Low Kwang Tong: Collective Sale Order Dispute(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sharmila Sanjeevi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sharmila Sanjeevi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	25,343.92	25,343.921 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Barun Electronics v. EZY Infotech: Summary Judgment for Unpaid Invoices Dispute 29 Jul 2020 EZY Infotech Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	29 Jul 2020	EZY Infotech Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Conditional Leave to DefendConditional leave to defend granted for the claim pertaining to the USD 25,343.92 Invoice, subject to furnishing security in that amount.
2	Aavanti Offshore v Bab Al Khail: Validity of Security Interests and Debit Notes Dispute 30 Mar 2020 Bab Al Khail General Trading (Respondent)Lost	30 Mar 2020	Bab Al Khail General Trading (Respondent): Claim dismissedClaim for security interest dismissed.
3	Teo Mei Ling Karen v Low Kwang Tong: Collective Sale Order Dispute 22 Aug 2018 Low Kwang Tong (Defendant)Lost	22 Aug 2018	Low Kwang Tong (Defendant): Objection dismissedObjection to collective sale dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).