Sharon Tay

Sharon Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and judgments and orders. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sharon Tay has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conventions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quantity Surveying	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fire Insurance Policy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
SIA Standard Conditions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sharon Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sharon Tay has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Donaldson & Burkinshaw	5 cases	83% of cases	Lea Tool v CGU: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Fire Insurance Claim(Nov 2000) Hong Huat v Hiap Hong: Arbitration Award Variation on Costs & Legal Principle Misapprehension(Aug 2000) Hong Huat v Hiap Hong: Implied Duties of Employers Regarding Architect's Certifying Functions under SIA Conditions(Jul 2000)
Donaldson and Burkinshaw	1 cases	17% of cases	Burswood Nominees Ltd v Liao Eng Kiat: Enforceability of Foreign Wagering Contract in Singapore(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sharon Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sharon Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	3(50%)	50%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	5 23	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 3 cases (60.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Burswood Nominees Ltd v Liao Eng Kiat: Enforceability of Foreign Wagering Contract in Singapore 31 Mar 2004 Burswood Nominees Ltd (formerly Burswood Nominees Pty Ltd) (Applicant)Won	31 Mar 2004	Burswood Nominees Ltd (formerly Burswood Nominees Pty Ltd) (Applicant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of Burswood Nominees Ltd. No monetary amount specified. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lea Tool v CGU: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Fire Insurance Claim 19 Nov 2000 CGU International Insurance plc (formerly known as Commercial Union Assurance Co plc) (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	19 Nov 2000	CGU International Insurance plc (formerly known as Commercial Union Assurance Co plc) (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, default judgment set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Hong Huat v Hiap Hong: Arbitration Award Variation on Costs & Legal Principle Misapprehension 03 Aug 2000 Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	03 Aug 2000	Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd (Respondent): Arbitration costs partially borneRespondents to pay 75% of the costs of the arbitration (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Hong Huat v Hiap Hong: Implied Duties of Employers Regarding Architect's Certifying Functions under SIA Conditions 05 Jul 2000 Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd (Respondent, Claimant)Partial	05 Jul 2000	Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd (Respondent, Claimant): Award partially set asideArbitrator’s award in respect of the first part of Item (a) and in respect of Items (b) to (d) is set aside.
5	Lum Chang v Anderson Land: Challenging Arbitration Award Under Section 22 of the Arbitration Act 04 Apr 2000 Lum Chang Building Contractors Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Apr 2000	Lum Chang Building Contractors Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no extension of time granted to file an application to set aside the award.
6	Hong Huat Development v Hiap Hong: Appeal Against Refusal to Grant Leave to Appeal Arbitration Award 20 Mar 2000 Hiap Hong & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	20 Mar 2000	Hiap Hong & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, subject to further hearing in the High Court.