Shashidran Nathan

Shashidran Nathan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal profession act and ad hoc admission. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in legal profession act and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shashidran Nathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shashidran Nathan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	33% of cases	Law Society v Tan Buck Chye: Show Cause for Improperly Procuring Conveyancing Work(Nov 2006)
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code(Sep 2013)
M/s Inca Law LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	PP v Lim Boon Hiong: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention(Jul 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shashidran Nathan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shashidran Nathan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code 18 Sep 2013 Lord Goldsmith Peter Henry PC QC (Applicant)Lost	18 Sep 2013	Lord Goldsmith Peter Henry PC QC (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for ad hoc admission to the Singapore Bar was dismissed.
2	PP v Lim Boon Hiong: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention 20 Jul 2010 Koay Teen Chew (Defendant)Lost	20 Jul 2010	Koay Teen Chew (Defendant): ConvictedKoay Teen Chew was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
3	Law Society v Tan Buck Chye: Show Cause for Improperly Procuring Conveyancing Work 29 Nov 2006 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	29 Nov 2006	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application GrantedThe Law Society's application to suspend the respondent was granted.