Shaun Koh

Shaun Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and civil practice. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shaun Koh has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Conveyance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shaun Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shaun Koh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Khattar Wong and Partners	5 cases	71% of cases	Ng Bok Eng Holdings v Wong Ser Wan: Fraudulent Conveyance & Creditor's Rights(Apr 2005) CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order(Apr 2005) Wong Ser Wan v Ng Bok Eng Holdings: Fraudulent Conveyance & Creditor's Rights(Sep 2004)
KhattarWong	2 cases	29% of cases	Golden Village v Phoon Chiong Kit: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Conflict of Interest(Feb 2006) De Montfort University v Stanford Training Systems: Stay of Winding-Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Debt Dispute(Oct 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shaun Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	14%
Lost	33.2 parties avg	3.2	43%
Partial	22.7 parties avg	2.7	29%
Stayed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	33.2 parties avg	3.2
2005	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shaun Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(14%)	14%
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Stayed	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Stayed: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Golden Village v Phoon Chiong Kit: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Conflict of Interest 27 Feb 2006 Phoon Chiong Kit (Defendant)Partial	27 Feb 2006	Phoon Chiong Kit (Defendant): Orders made for the defendant to give a written undertakingOrders made for the defendant to give a written undertaking not to act against the interests of the plaintiff as its director and not to participate in any manner in Suit 413 pending the outcome of SIC 3346 in that suit. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	De Montfort University v Stanford Training Systems: Stay of Winding-Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Debt Dispute 24 Oct 2005 De Montfort University (Petitioner, Defendant)Stayed	24 Oct 2005	De Montfort University (Petitioner, Defendant): Winding-up Petition StayedThe Winding-up Petition was stayed pending the determination of Suit 432 of 2005.
3	Ng Bok Eng Holdings v Wong Ser Wan: Fraudulent Conveyance & Creditor's Rights 27 Apr 2005 Bian Bee Company Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	27 Apr 2005	Bian Bee Company Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed only to the limited extent that the order to account for rental and profits is varied to be effective from the date on which Mr Ng was made a bankrupt. Appellants to pay 85% of the costs of this appeal. Security of costs to be released to the respondent to account of the respondent’s costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order 25 Apr 2005 Vikas Goel (Defendant, Appellant)Dismissed	25 Apr 2005	Vikas Goel (Defendant, Appellant): Application dismissedApplication for fortification of undertakings as to damages dismissed.
5	Wong Ser Wan v Ng Bok Eng Holdings: Fraudulent Conveyance & Creditor's Rights 05 Sep 2004 Bian Bee Company Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	05 Sep 2004	Bian Bee Company Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendants' application was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
6	Wong Ser Wan v Ng Bok Eng: Fraudulent Conveyance & Matrimonial Asset Division 18 Aug 2004 Bian Bee Company Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	18 Aug 2004	Bian Bee Company Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant's position was rejected, and the transfer of the NBEH shares was declared void. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
7	Lion City Holdings v Jumabhoy Asad: Amendment of Writ and Limitation Defence in Fiduciary Duty Claim 15 Jun 2004 Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jun 2004	Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal to amend the writ was dismissed, preventing the inclusion of a new cause of action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.