Sheela Kumari Devi

Sheela Kumari Devi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and judicial management. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Private Education Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sheela Kumari Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sheela Kumari Devi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Rabobank v Jurong Technologies: Unfair Preference Claim under Companies Act(Sep 2011) Stansfield Group v Consumers’ Association: Tort, Contract & Suspension of CaseTrust Membership(May 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sheela Kumari Devi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.3 parties avg	3.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	23.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sheela Kumari Devi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rabobank v Jurong Technologies: Unfair Preference Claim under Companies Act 15 Sep 2011 Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank International, Singapore Branch) (Appellant)Lost	15 Sep 2011	Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank International, Singapore Branch) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision to set aside the payment as an unfair preference was dismissed.
2	Stansfield Group v Consumers’ Association: Tort, Contract & Suspension of CaseTrust Membership 17 May 2011 SIC College of Business and Technology Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 May 2011	SIC College of Business and Technology Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).