Sheik Umar

Sheik Umar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sheik Umar has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Parol Evidence Rule	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance Bonds	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Entire Agreement Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cause of action estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Refund Guarantees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private Education Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sheik Umar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sheik Umar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Marken Limited (Singapore Branch) v Scott Ohanesian: Breach of Contract of Service & Termination Without Notice(Oct 2017) Tan Hup Yuan Patrick v The Griffin Coal Mining: Setting Aside Statutory Demand Based on Consent Judgment(Aug 2014) Master Marine AS v Labroy Offshore Ltd: Refund Guarantees & Shipbuilding Contract Dispute(Apr 2012)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Stansfield Group v Consumers’ Association: Tort, Contract & Suspension of CaseTrust Membership(May 2011) Gelatissimo Ventures v Singapore Flyer: Striking Out Privileged Communication in Pre-Action Discovery(Oct 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sheik Umar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Lost	24.7 parties avg	4.7	40%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sheik Umar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	2,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Marken Limited (Singapore Branch) v Scott Ohanesian: Breach of Contract of Service & Termination Without Notice 19 Oct 2017 Marken Limited (Singapore Branch) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	19 Oct 2017	Marken Limited (Singapore Branch) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedMarken Singapore’s claim was dismissed in its entirety.
2	Tan Hup Yuan Patrick v The Griffin Coal Mining: Setting Aside Statutory Demand Based on Consent Judgment 05 Aug 2014 The Griffin Coal Mining Co Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) (Respondent)Won	05 Aug 2014	The Griffin Coal Mining Co Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $8,000 to the Defendants inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Master Marine AS v Labroy Offshore Ltd: Refund Guarantees & Shipbuilding Contract Dispute 17 Apr 2012 Master Marine AS (Appellant)Won	17 Apr 2012	Master Marine AS (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, injunction restraining the Banks from making payment to Master Marine AS under the New Demand discharged. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Stansfield Group v Consumers’ Association: Tort, Contract & Suspension of CaseTrust Membership 17 May 2011 SIC College of Business and Technology Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 May 2011	SIC College of Business and Technology Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Gelatissimo Ventures v Singapore Flyer: Striking Out Privileged Communication in Pre-Action Discovery 20 Oct 2009 Singapore Flyer Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	20 Oct 2009	Singapore Flyer Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).