Sherlyn Neo

Sherlyn Neo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in prevention of corruption act and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and prevention of corruption act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Match-fixing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Secret Profits	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sports Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sherlyn Neo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	Ding Si Yang v PP: Match-Fixing, Corruption, and Sentencing in Football(Jan 2015) Public Prosecutor v Leng Kah Poh: Interpretation of s 6(a) Prevention of Corruption Act(Oct 2014) Leng Kah Poh v PP: Corruption Charges & F&B Contracts at IKEA Singapore(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sherlyn Neo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Unknown	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sherlyn Neo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Unknown	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Unknown: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ding Si Yang v PP: Match-Fixing, Corruption, and Sentencing in Football 15 Jan 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	15 Jan 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Cross-appeal allowedThe prosecution's cross-appeal against the sentence was allowed.
2	Public Prosecutor v Leng Kah Poh: Interpretation of s 6(a) Prevention of Corruption Act 16 Oct 2014 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)	16 Oct 2014	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): -
3	Leng Kah Poh v PP: Corruption Charges & F&B Contracts at IKEA Singapore 17 Sep 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	17 Sep 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was overturned.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mervin Singh: Trafficking Diamorphine Case 04 Oct 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Oct 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedBoth accused were found guilty as charged.