Sherlyn Neo Xiulin

Sherlyn Neo Xiulin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in constitutional law and criminal law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sherlyn Neo Xiulin has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in constitutional law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Constitutional Law	3 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo Xiulin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo Xiulin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo Xiulin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Human Sexuality	2 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo Xiulin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo Xiulin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo Xiulin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sherlyn Neo Xiulin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sherlyn Neo Xiulin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & LGBTQ Rights(Oct 2013) Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code(Sep 2013) Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A & LGBTQ+ Rights(Apr 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sherlyn Neo Xiulin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	32.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sherlyn Neo Xiulin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & LGBTQ Rights 01 Oct 2013 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	01 Oct 2013	Attorney-General (Defendant): Application dismissedThe Plaintiff's application was dismissed.
2	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code 18 Sep 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	18 Sep 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Opposition UpheldThe Attorney-General's opposition to the application was upheld.
3	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A & LGBTQ+ Rights 08 Apr 2013 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	08 Apr 2013	Attorney-General (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim that s 377A is unconstitutional and infringes their rights under Art 12 was dismissed.