Shirin Tang

Shirin Tang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and strata title law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shirin Tang has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and mistake of law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mistake of Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Citizenship	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ultra vires	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Management Corporation Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Compromise	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assumption of Risk	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shirin Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shirin Tang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	IDA v SingTel: Restitution for Mistake of Law in Telecom License Modification Compensation(May 2002) Management Corporation v De Beers: Recovery of Payments & Strata Title Act(Mar 2002) Yeo Peng Hock Henry v Pai Lily: Costs Settlement in Appeal(Nov 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shirin Tang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shirin Tang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	370,000.00	123,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	IDA v SingTel: Restitution for Mistake of Law in Telecom License Modification Compensation 29 May 2002 Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff)Lost	29 May 2002	Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for restitution of $388 million was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
2	Management Corporation v De Beers: Recovery of Payments & Strata Title Act 05 Mar 2002 De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	05 Mar 2002	De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd (Respondent): Counterclaim AllowedDe Beers' counterclaim for $370,000 was allowed, with interest awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Yeo Peng Hock Henry v Pai Lily: Costs Settlement in Appeal 06 Nov 2001 Pai Lily (Respondent)Neutral	06 Nov 2001	Pai Lily (Respondent): No order as to costsNo order as to costs made by the court (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Yeo Peng Hock Henry v Pai Lily: Medical Negligence, Doctor's Duty of Care & Causation 25 Oct 2001 Pai Lily (Respondent)Lost	25 Oct 2001	Pai Lily (Respondent): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed due to failure to prove causation.