Shobna d/o V Chandran

Shobna d/o V Chandran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Global Master Repurchase Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administration of Estates	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disputed Debt	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Standard of Review	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prima Facie	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shobna d/o V Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shobna d/o V Chandran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	75% of cases	AnAn Group v. VTB Bank: Winding Up, Disputed Debt & Arbitration Agreement(Apr 2020) Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2019) VTB Bank v Anan Group: Winding Up Application & Disputed Debt(Nov 2018)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Lim Weipin v Lim Boh Chuan: Intestate Succession & Impersonation in Family Estate Dispute(Mar 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shobna d/o V Chandran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shobna d/o V Chandran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AnAn Group v. VTB Bank: Winding Up, Disputed Debt & Arbitration Agreement 06 Apr 2020 VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	06 Apr 2020	VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Winding-up application dismissedWinding-up application dismissed. VTB is to pay the costs of the hearing below fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements and the costs of the appeal fixed at $70,000 inclusive of disbursements and such costs shall include the costs for CA/SUM 33/2019 and CA/SUM 89/2019. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Nov 2019 Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Appellant)Lost	24 Nov 2019	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Appellant): Appeal DismissedMoad Fadzir's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
3	VTB Bank v Anan Group: Winding Up Application & Disputed Debt 18 Nov 2018 VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Plaintiff)Won	18 Nov 2018	VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffWinding up order made against the Defendant; costs of the proceedings to be paid to the Plaintiff out of the assets of the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Lim Weipin v Lim Boh Chuan: Intestate Succession & Impersonation in Family Estate Dispute 29 Mar 2010 Administrators of Goh Choon Eng’s estate (Defendant)Won	29 Mar 2010	Administrators of Goh Choon Eng’s estate (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant; Plaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.