Shum Wai Keong

Shum Wai Keong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Reliance Loss	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shum Wai Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shum Wai Keong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	PT Panosonic Gobel Indonesia v Stratech Systems Ltd: Reliance Loss, Breach of Contract(May 2010) ING Belgium NV v Projector SA: Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore(Dec 2008) Panasonic v Stratech: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in ERP System Implementation(Oct 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shum Wai Keong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shum Wai Keong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,660,000.00	1,830,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PT Panosonic Gobel Indonesia v Stratech Systems Ltd: Reliance Loss, Breach of Contract 05 May 2010 PT Panosonic Gobel Indonesia (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	05 May 2010	PT Panosonic Gobel Indonesia (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the plaintiff was awarded S$1,830,000 in damages. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
2	ING Belgium NV v Projector SA: Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore 11 Dec 2008 Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG (Respondent)Neutral	11 Dec 2008	Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG (Respondent): NeutralSupporting creditor
3	Panasonic v Stratech: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in ERP System Implementation 09 Oct 2008 PT Panasonic Gobel Indonesia (Plaintiff)Won	09 Oct 2008	PT Panasonic Gobel Indonesia (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff for damages to be assessed and costs. Damages are capped at SGD 1,830,000, representing the total cost of services to be provided by Stratech. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.