Sigmund Seah Bingsen

Sigmund Seah Bingsen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and minority oppression. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and chancery and equity.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sigmund Seah Bingsen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sigmund Seah Bingsen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Loo & Partners LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low Tuck Loong: Oppression of Minority Shareholders in Company Voluntary Winding Up(Apr 2022)
Joo Toon LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Ng Chee Tian v Ng Chee Pong: Unjust Enrichment, Limitation Act & Proprietary Remedies Dispute(Sep 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sigmund Seah Bingsen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sigmund Seah Bingsen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	10,000,000.00	10,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Chee Tian v Ng Chee Pong: Unjust Enrichment, Limitation Act & Proprietary Remedies Dispute 03 Sep 2024 Ng Chee Seng (Claimant)Lost	03 Sep 2024	Ng Chee Seng (Claimant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; appeal not allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low Tuck Loong: Oppression of Minority Shareholders in Company Voluntary Winding Up 11 Apr 2022 Sim Eng Chuan (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	11 Apr 2022	Sim Eng Chuan (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Low and Sim shall be jointly and severally liable to buyout Wei’s shares at US$5m.