Simon Cheong

Simon Cheong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and libel, slander and defamation. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Simon Cheong has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misconduct of arbitrator	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Removal of arbitrator	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Simon Cheong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Simon Cheong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	3 cases	100% of cases	Koh Bros v Scotts Development: Arbitrator Misconduct & Removal in Construction Dispute(Sep 2002) Gispen v Ling: Piercing the Corporate Veil & Misrepresentation in Timber Concession Sale(Nov 2001) Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation(Apr 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Simon Cheong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.6
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	33%
Won	24.7 parties avg	4.7	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2001	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Simon Cheong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Koh Bros v Scotts Development: Arbitrator Misconduct & Removal in Construction Dispute 20 Sep 2002 Koh Bros Building and Civil Engineering Contractor Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	20 Sep 2002	Koh Bros Building and Civil Engineering Contractor Pte Ltd (Applicant): Motion GrantedMotion to remove the arbitrator was granted. The contractors’ costs shall be paid by the employers, as taxed or agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Gispen v Ling: Piercing the Corporate Veil & Misrepresentation in Timber Concession Sale 21 Nov 2001 Ling Lee Soon Philip (Defendant)Won	21 Nov 2001	Ling Lee Soon Philip (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant; no monetary award. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation 23 Apr 2000 Ronald T Eckstrom (Defendant)Partial	23 Apr 2000	Ronald T Eckstrom (Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the right to seek discovery, but the specific discovery requests were deemed too broad. Applications remitted for reconsideration. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).