Singh Ranjit

Singh Ranjit is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in child support and family law. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Singh Ranjit has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in judgments and orders and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Welfare	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singh Ranjit has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Singh Ranjit has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Francis Khoo & Lim	4 cases	100% of cases	Peck Wee Boon v Lim Poh Goon: Costs Allocation After Dismissal of Claims(May 2024) Gunasegarn v Singapore Indhia Kalaingyar Sangam: Membership Expulsion Dispute(Feb 2022) URN v URM: Child Maintenance Dispute Involving Singapore and Swedish Orders(Jan 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Singh Ranjit's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.2
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	36.6 parties avg	6.6	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2022	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Singh Ranjit's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Peck Wee Boon v Lim Poh Goon: Costs Allocation After Dismissal of Claims 07 May 2024 Haixia Crystal Development Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 May 2024	Haixia Crystal Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims against this defendant were dismissed.
2	Gunasegarn v Singapore Indhia Kalaingyar Sangam: Membership Expulsion Dispute 27 Feb 2022 Rajasekaran s/o K S Maniyam (Plaintiff)Won	27 Feb 2022	Rajasekaran s/o K S Maniyam (Plaintiff): Expulsion order declared invalidThe court declared the expulsion order against Rajasekaran invalid and set it aside. No monetary amount was awarded. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
3	URN v URM: Child Maintenance Dispute Involving Singapore and Swedish Orders 16 Jan 2022 URN (Appellant)Lost	16 Jan 2022	URN (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the District Judge's decision regarding child maintenance was dismissed.
4	Tan Bee Hong Blossom v Tan Seng Keow Doreen: Winding Up & Family Business Dispute 29 Apr 2020 Chiap Chuan Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Apr 2020	Chiap Chuan Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant; Plaintiffs ordered to pay costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).