Siva Murugaiyan

Siva Murugaiyan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and private international law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of clause in deed	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Settlement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fatal Accidents Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recovery of Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Inheritance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Siva Murugaiyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Siva Murugaiyan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sant Singh Partnership	5 cases	50% of cases	Masters v To: Fatal Accident, Dependency Claim, Loss of Inheritance & Support(Jan 2005) Lassiter v To: Appeal on Damages Assessment & Admissibility of Evidence(Mar 2004) Masters v To Keng Lam: Appeal of Damages Assessment, Admissibility of Further Evidence(Aug 2003)
Colin Ng & Partners	4 cases	40% of cases	Denko-HLB Sdn Bhd v Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd: Extension of Time for Appeal(Jul 2002) Denko-HLB Sdn Bhd v Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd: Extension of Time for Appeal(Jul 2002) Hong Pian Tee v Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Allegation of Fraud(Mar 2002)
Madhavan Partnership	1 cases	10% of cases	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Contractual Terms, Specific Performance & Interpretation of Deed(Jan 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Siva Murugaiyan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	20%
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	52.2 parties avg	2.2
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Siva Murugaiyan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	2(20%)	20%
Won	5(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
CAD	360,645.00	360,645.001 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	5 14	Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Contractual Terms, Specific Performance & Interpretation of Deed 28 Jan 2007 Lal Hiranand (Appellant)Won	28 Jan 2007	Lal Hiranand (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, with costs here and below. The deposit for costs paid by the appellant is to be refunded to him. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Masters v To: Fatal Accident, Dependency Claim, Loss of Inheritance & Support 09 Jan 2005 Lassiter Ann Masters (suing as the widow and dependant of Lassiter Henry Adolphus, deceased) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	09 Jan 2005	Lassiter Ann Masters (suing as the widow and dependant of Lassiter Henry Adolphus, deceased) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; multiplier for loss of support varied from eight years to ten years. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	Lassiter v To: Appeal on Damages Assessment & Admissibility of Evidence 25 Mar 2004 Lassiter Ann Masters (Appellant)Lost	25 Mar 2004	Lassiter Ann Masters (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with two-thirds costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Masters v To Keng Lam: Appeal of Damages Assessment, Admissibility of Further Evidence 19 Aug 2003 Lassiter Ann Masters (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Aug 2003	Lassiter Ann Masters (Plaintiff): Applications dismissedApplications to adduce further evidence were dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Kamla Lal Hiranand v Lal Hiranand: Summons in Chambers, Consent Order & Originating Summons Dispute 07 Aug 2003 Lal Hiranand (Defendant)Neutral	07 Aug 2003	Lal Hiranand (Defendant): No orders madeNo orders were made in respect of Summons-in-Chambers No 600208 of 2003 as the issues there have been rendered irrelevant by reason of the disposal of the plaintiff’s summons-in-chambers.
6	Mah Wand Hew v Ong Yew Huat: Recovery of Pay and Retrenchment Benefits Dispute 24 Nov 2002 Mah Wand Hew (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Nov 2002	Mah Wand Hew (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentDecision of the Liquidators in rejecting the Proof of Debt is reversed in part. The items of claims allowed in accordance with this judgment be paid according to the priority as set out in the Companies Act.
7	Denko-HLB Sdn Bhd v Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd: Extension of Time for Appeal 02 Jul 2002 Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Jul 2002	Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): Motion dismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the motion for extension of time (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Denko-HLB Sdn Bhd v Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd: Extension of Time for Appeal 01 Jul 2002 Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	01 Jul 2002	Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Motion dismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the motion by the other party.
9	Hong Pian Tee v Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Allegation of Fraud 27 Mar 2002 Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	27 Mar 2002	Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted in favor of the plaintiff for C$360,645.00 plus interest and costs, based on the Canadian judgment.
10	Hong Pian Tee v Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Allegation of Fraud 20 Mar 2002 Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	20 Mar 2002	Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted to Les Placements, enforcing the Canadian judgment against Hong Pian Tee.