Siva Shanmugam

Siva Shanmugam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and theft.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Multi-Level Marketing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Siva Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Siva Shanmugam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	Thong Ah Fat v PP: Misuse of Drugs Act & Knowledge of Controlled Drug Nature(Nov 2011) Phang Wah v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading, CBT, Falsification of Accounts(Nov 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Siva Shanmugam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Siva Shanmugam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Thong Ah Fat v PP: Misuse of Drugs Act & Knowledge of Controlled Drug Nature 29 Nov 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	29 Nov 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and a retrial was ordered.
2	Phang Wah v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading, CBT, Falsification of Accounts 20 Nov 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Neutral	20 Nov 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Cross-appeal dismissedCross-appeal against sentences dismissed.