Sivanathan Jheevanesh

Sivanathan Jheevanesh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and arbitration. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in sentencing and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Sentencing	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Apparent bias	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Rape	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Attempted Statutory Rape	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Subscription Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside application	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sivanathan Jheevanesh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sivanathan Jheevanesh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	60% of cases	CRH v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Attempted Aggravated Statutory Rape Sentence & Applicability of Mandatory Minimum Sentence(Aug 2024) Public Prosecutor v CRH: Attempted Aggravated Rape & Mandatory Minimum Sentencing(Feb 2024) Attorney-General v Xu Yuan Chen: Contempt of Court, Publishing Scandalous Material(Apr 2023)
Cavenagh Law LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	BYL v BYN: Setting Aside Application Costs in ICC Arbitration(May 2020) BYL v BYN: Setting Aside of ICC Partial Award Due to Put Option Reliefs and Arbitrator Bias(Mar 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sivanathan Jheevanesh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sivanathan Jheevanesh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	177,000.00	88,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CRH v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Attempted Aggravated Statutory Rape Sentence & Applicability of Mandatory Minimum Sentence 13 Aug 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Aug 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
2	Public Prosecutor v CRH: Attempted Aggravated Rape & Mandatory Minimum Sentencing 04 Feb 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Feb 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): SuccessfulAccused sentenced to a global sentence of 13 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
3	Attorney-General v Xu Yuan Chen: Contempt of Court, Publishing Scandalous Material 05 Apr 2023 Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	05 Apr 2023	Attorney-General (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantJudgment for the Attorney-General; costs of OS 694 fixed at $4,000 and costs of SUM 3816 fixed at $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	BYL v BYN: Setting Aside Application Costs in ICC Arbitration 10 May 2020 BYM (Plaintiff)Lost	10 May 2020	BYM (Plaintiff): Costs to be paid to DefendantPlaintiffs are to pay the Defendant's costs of S$82,500. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	BYL v BYN: Setting Aside of ICC Partial Award Due to Put Option Reliefs and Arbitrator Bias 02 Mar 2020 BYM (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Mar 2020	BYM (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe Plaintiffs' application to set aside the ICC Award was dismissed.