Smitha Rajan Menon

Smitha Rajan Menon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international arbitration and ad hoc admission. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misrepresentation and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misrepresentation	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Indian Contract Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accumulators	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Smitha Rajan Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Smitha Rajan Menon has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Harish Salve v BPW: Ad Hoc Admission for Foreign Counsel in ICC Arbitration Dispute(Jan 2018) Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Dispute over Unauthorized Accumulator Trades(Apr 2011) Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute(May 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Smitha Rajan Menon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	24.7 parties avg	4.7	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Smitha Rajan Menon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,284,000.00	8,284,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Harish Salve v BPW: Ad Hoc Admission for Foreign Counsel in ICC Arbitration Dispute 24 Jan 2018 Harish Salve (Appellant, Applicant)Won	24 Jan 2018	Harish Salve (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeals, reversing the High Court's decision to dismiss the applications for ad hoc admission.
2	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Dispute over Unauthorized Accumulator Trades 10 Apr 2011 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent)Lost	10 Apr 2011	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent): Judgment Set AsideThe judgment in favor of Crédit Industriel et Commercial was set aside, and a new trial was ordered.
3	Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute 25 May 2009 Vincent Chesney (Defendant)Won	25 May 2009	Vincent Chesney (Defendant): Claim DismissedPender's claim against Vincent Chesney for damages for alleged misrepresentation was dismissed.