Smrithi Sadasivam

Smrithi Sadasivam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction industry security of payment act. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	6 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lump sum contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Housing Developers	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles Board	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Smrithi Sadasivam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Smrithi Sadasivam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	7 cases	100% of cases	Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA & Fraud in Construction Contract Dispute(Sep 2024) CGS Construction v Quek & Quek: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOPA(Jul 2024) DFI v DFJ: Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award Dismissed; Costs Awarded to DFJ(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Smrithi Sadasivam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	28.0 parties avg	8.0	29%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	37.3 parties avg	7.3
2024	42.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Smrithi Sadasivam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,331,247.11	666,249.425 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2024	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA & Fraud in Construction Contract Dispute 17 Sep 2024 Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	17 Sep 2024	Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the decision below in respect of the reduction of $155,160. Garnished sum of $23,668.05 to be returned to Builders Hub Pte Ltd. Costs of the appeal fixed at $20,000 inclusive of disbursements. Costs below fixed at $17,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CGS Construction v Quek & Quek: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOPA 15 Jul 2024 CGS Construction Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	15 Jul 2024	CGS Construction Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed.
3	DFI v DFJ: Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award Dismissed; Costs Awarded to DFJ 02 May 2024 DFJ (Defendant)Won	02 May 2024	DFJ (Defendant): Costs AwardedCosts of $131,516.36 awarded to DFJ (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	DFI v DFJ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice 31 Jan 2024 DFJ (Defendant)Won	31 Jan 2024	DFJ (Defendant): Application dismissedThe application to set aside the partial award was dismissed.
5	Terrenus Energy v Attika Interior: Construction Delay & Defect Dispute 26 Nov 2023 Attika Interior + MEP Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	26 Nov 2023	Attika Interior + MEP Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim partially allowedCounterclaim partially allowed; balance of contract sum awarded, subject to deductions. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	JP Nelson v Builders Hub: Setting Aside SOPA Adjudication for Fraud and Premature Application 04 Jul 2023 Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 Jul 2023	Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Respondent): Review Adjudicated Amount reducedThe Adjudication Review Amount was reduced by the amount of $155,160, and Builders Hub is ordered to repay JP Nelson the sum of $155,160, being the sum that Builders Hub had unlawfully gained by the fraud. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Chwee Wah v Yow Jia Wen: Collective Sale Dispute over Chuan Park En Bloc 25 May 2023 Long Wee Fong (Defendant)Lost	25 May 2023	Long Wee Fong (Defendant): Objection DismissedObjection to the collective sale dismissed.