Sngeeta Rai

Sngeeta Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 13.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trustees Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Advice Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pre-action Disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Norwich Pharmacal Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Post-operative care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Surgical procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sngeeta Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sngeeta Rai has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	6 cases	86% of cases	Intas Pharmaceuticals v DealStreetAsia: Pre-Action Disclosure & Discovery in Malicious Falsehood Claim(Apr 2017) CIFG v Polimet: Interpretation of Indemnity Clause in Convertible Bond Agreements(Feb 2017) Koo Quay Keong v Ooi Peng Jin: Negligence Claim for Post-Operative Care After Whipple Operation(Aug 2016)
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Sullivan v Hill Capital: Trust Administration, Proper Law, and Forum Disputes(Jun 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sngeeta Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.1
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	66.1 parties avg	6.1	86%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	18.0 parties avg	8.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sngeeta Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(75%)	75%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	1(13%)	13%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,960,000.00	2,320,000.003 cases	3
USD	56,546,065.00	56,546,065.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sullivan v Hill Capital: Trust Administration, Proper Law, and Forum Disputes 19 Jun 2024 Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	19 Jun 2024	Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedRespondents to pay the applicant costs, fixed at $12,000 per respondent (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Intas Pharmaceuticals v DealStreetAsia: Pre-Action Disclosure & Discovery in Malicious Falsehood Claim 09 Apr 2017 DEALSTREETASIA PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	09 Apr 2017	DEALSTREETASIA PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedDefendant's appeal dismissed.
3	CIFG v Polimet: Interpretation of Indemnity Clause in Convertible Bond Agreements 07 Feb 2017 Yap Tien Sung (Defendant)Won	07 Feb 2017	Yap Tien Sung (Defendant): Claim dismissed against Yap Tien SungThe plaintiff's claim against Yap Tien Sung for the outstanding sums owing by Polimet under Clause 12.1 of the CBSAs is dismissed.
4	Koo Quay Keong v Ooi Peng Jin: Negligence Claim for Post-Operative Care After Whipple Operation 23 Aug 2016 Koo Quay Keong (Administrator of the Estate of Lee Lee Chan, Deceased) (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Aug 2016	Koo Quay Keong (Administrator of the Estate of Lee Lee Chan, Deceased) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed.
5	AZZ v BAA: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Maintenance, and Custody Dispute in Divorce Proceedings 30 Mar 2016 AZZ (Plaintiff)Partial	30 Mar 2016	AZZ (Plaintiff): Partial Division of Matrimonial AssetsWife received 41.9% of the matrimonial assets (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	CIFG v Polimet: Legal Professional Privilege & Joint Retainer in Contractual Disputes 22 Dec 2015 Yap Tien Sung (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	22 Dec 2015	Yap Tien Sung (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against them was dismissed.
7	Lee Tat Development v Management Corp: Dispute over Right of Way & Malicious Prosecution 11 Feb 2015 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 (Defendant)Lost	11 Feb 2015	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 (Defendant): Application to strike out dismissedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff’s action dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.