Soh Wei Chi

Soh Wei Chi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international law and sham agreements. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated expertise across 58 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Piercing corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bonus	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collateral Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warehouseman Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Financing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pledge of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Pledgee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sovereign Immunity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soh Wei Chi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Soh Wei Chi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kenneth Tan Partnership	7 cases	88% of cases	Bulk Trading SA v Pevensey Pte Ltd: Corporate Representation & Rules of Court(Nov 2014) Brader v Commerzbank: Enforceability of Discretionary Bonus Promises & Contractual Obligations(Jan 2014) ABN AMRO Bank v CWT Commodities: Collateral Management Agreement & Warehouseman's Duty(Jan 2011)
Ng Chong & Hue LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim(Sep 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Soh Wei Chi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	38%
Won	54.8 parties avg	4.8	63%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Soh Wei Chi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Won	5(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	750.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bulk Trading SA v Pevensey Pte Ltd: Corporate Representation & Rules of Court 23 Nov 2014 Bulk Trading SA (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Nov 2014	Bulk Trading SA (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication by Pevensey Singapore dismissed; Bulk Trading awarded costs of $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Brader v Commerzbank: Enforceability of Discretionary Bonus Promises & Contractual Obligations 06 Jan 2014 Daniel John Brader and others (Plaintiff)Won	06 Jan 2014	Daniel John Brader and others (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPlaintiffs' claim for breach of contract is allowed. The Defendant is to pay the Plaintiffs the bonuses declared on Letter Day, less the 10% that was paid out on 19 February 2009. In addition, pre-judgment interest at the rate of 5.33% per annum on these sums is to be paid to the Plaintiffs beginning 19 February 2009 and ending on the date of this decision. Costs are to follow the event, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	ABN AMRO Bank v CWT Commodities: Collateral Management Agreement & Warehouseman's Duty 16 Jan 2011 CWT Commodities (SEA) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Jan 2011	CWT Commodities (SEA) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim against the plaintiff was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation: Sovereign Immunity & Interpleader Proceedings 23 Mar 2008 Plaintiffs in the estate of Ferdinand and E Marcos Human Rights Litigation in Case No. MDL840-R in the United States District of Hawaii (Respondent)Won	23 Mar 2008	Plaintiffs in the estate of Ferdinand and E Marcos Human Rights Litigation in Case No. MDL840-R in the United States District of Hawaii (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Republic of the Philippines was ordered to bear 50% of the costs of the respondents in the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim 20 Sep 2007 PT Dianlia Setyamukti (Defendant)Won	20 Sep 2007	PT Dianlia Setyamukti (Defendant): Claim DismissedBeckkett's claim against PT Dianlia Setyamukti was dismissed.
6	Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG: Amendment of Reply, Sham Documents & Backdating Allegations 28 Dec 2006 PT Dianlia Setyamukti (Defendant)Lost	28 Dec 2006	PT Dianlia Setyamukti (Defendant): Application GrantedThe court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend its reply to the second defendant's defence.
7	WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank: Sovereign Immunity & Commercial Transactions 26 Dec 2006 Plaintiffs in the Estate of Ferdinand E Marcos Human Rights Litigation (Defendant)Won	26 Dec 2006	Plaintiffs in the Estate of Ferdinand E Marcos Human Rights Litigation (Defendant): WonThe Republic's application to stay the claims of the 7th defendant was dismissed.
8	Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG: Interim Injunction on Share Sale in Indonesian Coalmine Dispute 26 May 2005 PT Dianlia Sety Amukti (Defendant)Won	26 May 2005	PT Dianlia Sety Amukti (Defendant): Application DeniedApplication for interim injunction restraining sale of shares was denied.