Soo Poh Huat

Soo Poh Huat is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in matrimonial assets and maintenance.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and matrimonial assets.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	3 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Registration of Title	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soo Poh Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Soo Poh Huat has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Soo Poh Huat & Co.	3 cases	100% of cases	Tien Choon Kuan v Tien Chwan Hoa: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Promissory Estoppel & Land Title Registration(Feb 2016) AXW v AXX: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance Appeal(Jun 2012) Pang Rosaline v Chan Kong Chin: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute(Feb 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Soo Poh Huat's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Unknown	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Soo Poh Huat's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Other	1(33%)	33%
Unknown	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Unknown: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tien Choon Kuan v Tien Chwan Hoa: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Promissory Estoppel & Land Title Registration 14 Feb 2016 Chan Hui Soo Elizabeth (Other)	14 Feb 2016	Chan Hui Soo Elizabeth (Other): -
2	AXW v AXX: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance Appeal 04 Jun 2012 AXX (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	04 Jun 2012	AXX (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed regarding the division of matrimonial assets (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Pang Rosaline v Chan Kong Chin: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute 17 Feb 2009 Pang Rosaline (Petitioner)Other	17 Feb 2009	Pang Rosaline (Petitioner): Appeal filed against the orders made.The wife was dissatisfied with all the orders made and filed a notice of appeal (in Civil Appeal No 168 of 2008) against the decision.