Soon Jia Ling Amanda

Soon Jia Ling Amanda is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and copyrights. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trademarks and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trademarks	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Soon Jia Ling Amanda has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Soon Jia Ling Amanda has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Combe International Ltd v Dr August Wolff: Trademark Opposition & VAGISAN Mark(Apr 2022) COMPASS v SingNet: Copyright Tribunal's Power to Grant Retrospective Orders(Oct 2020)
Sun Jianing	1 cases	33% of cases	Dr. August Wolff v. Combe: Trade Mark Invalidity & Likelihood of Confusion(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Soon Jia Ling Amanda's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Soon Jia Ling Amanda's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,500.00	3,750.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Combe International Ltd v Dr August Wolff: Trademark Opposition & VAGISAN Mark 06 Apr 2022 Combe International Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	06 Apr 2022	Combe International Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Dr. August Wolff v. Combe: Trade Mark Invalidity & Likelihood of Confusion 24 Feb 2021 Combe International Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	24 Feb 2021	Combe International Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Application for Invalidity AllowedApplication for invalidity of the plaintiff's trade mark allowed; awarded costs of the appeal fixed at $7,500 (inclusive of disbursements) from the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	COMPASS v SingNet: Copyright Tribunal's Power to Grant Retrospective Orders 12 Oct 2020 SingNet Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	12 Oct 2020	SingNet Pte Ltd (Respondent): WonThe court answered the question in the negative, in favor of the respondent's submission.