Soon Ser Jia Clarissa

Soon Ser Jia Clarissa is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and time-fixing order. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Kompetenz-Kompetenz	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Provisional Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Time-Fixing Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Provisional Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Disclosure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory derivative action	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Soon Ser Jia Clarissa has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	DFM v DFL: Jurisdictional Waiver in Interim Arbitration Relief Application(Oct 2024) Hilton v Sun Travels: Contempt of Court for Failure to Comply with Arbitration Award(May 2024) DFL v DFM: Setting Aside Enforcement Order of Provisional Award Under DIAC Rules(Mar 2024)
Aequitas Law LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Chng Kheng Chye v Kaefer Prostar: Statutory Derivative Action & Leave to Commence Suit(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Soon Ser Jia Clarissa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.5 parties avg	2.5	75%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	32.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Soon Ser Jia Clarissa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	297,500.00	74,375.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DFM v DFL: Jurisdictional Waiver in Interim Arbitration Relief Application 16 Oct 2024 DFM (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2024	DFM (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed in the aggregate sum of $31,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Hilton v Sun Travels: Contempt of Court for Failure to Comply with Arbitration Award 08 May 2024 Ahmed Siyam Mohamed (Defendant)Lost	08 May 2024	Ahmed Siyam Mohamed (Defendant): Contempt of CourtFound in contempt of court; initially sentenced to imprisonment, later substituted with a $100,000 fine upon full payment of the judgment debt (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	DFL v DFM: Setting Aside Enforcement Order of Provisional Award Under DIAC Rules 14 Mar 2024 DFM (Respondent)Lost	14 Mar 2024	DFM (Respondent): Order to pay costsThe respondent was ordered to pay the applicant costs, fixed at $50,500 (inclusive of disbursements amounting to $32,500). The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chng Kheng Chye v Kaefer Prostar: Statutory Derivative Action & Leave to Commence Suit 02 Sep 2020 Kaefer Integrated Services Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Sep 2020	Kaefer Integrated Services Pte Ltd (Respondent): WonCosts for both applications were awarded to the respondents and fixed at S$8,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.