Sophia Rossman

Sophia Rossman is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in child custody and care and control.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sophia Rossman has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and child custody.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Parenting Styles	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sophia Rossman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sophia Rossman has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	WQI v WQH: Child Custody and Care & Control Dispute After Divorce(Jan 2024)
Selvam LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Sim Kwai Meng v Pang Moh Yin Patricia: Res Judicata & Oral Agreement Dispute(Jan 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sophia Rossman's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sophia Rossman's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WQI v WQH: Child Custody and Care & Control Dispute After Divorce 28 Jan 2024 WQI (Appellant)Lost	28 Jan 2024	WQI (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no costs imposed for the appeal.
2	Sim Kwai Meng v Pang Moh Yin Patricia: Res Judicata & Oral Agreement Dispute 20 Jan 2022 Pang Moh Yin Patricia, the personal representative of Beatrice Chia Soo Hia (deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Jan 2022	Pang Moh Yin Patricia, the personal representative of Beatrice Chia Soo Hia (deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedW’s claim based on the oral agreement was dismissed due to res judicata.