Spencer Chew

Spencer Chew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in disciplinary proceedings and professional misconduct. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Spencer Chew has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in disciplinary proceedings and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Spencer Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	22% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Spencer Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Spencer Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Spencer Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Touting	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Spencer Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Spencer Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Spencer Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Spencer Chew has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Global Law Alliance LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Disciplinary Tribunal's Duty to Investigate Touting Charges(Jan 2025) Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Touting Allegations(Jan 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Spencer Chew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Spencer Chew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	3,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Disciplinary Tribunal's Duty to Investigate Touting Charges 12 Jan 2025 Shanmugam Manohar (Respondent)Lost	12 Jan 2025	Shanmugam Manohar (Respondent): Fresh hearing orderedThe court ordered the Law Society to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of another Disciplinary Tribunal to hear and investigate the matter.
2	Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Touting Allegations 30 Jan 2024 Shanmugam Manohar (Respondent)Won	30 Jan 2024	Shanmugam Manohar (Respondent): No cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary actionThe Disciplinary Tribunal found that there was no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action against Mr. Manohar under s 83 of the LPA, and that a financial penalty of $3,000 was sufficient and appropriate. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).