SR Shanmugam

SR Shanmugam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in moneylenders act and caveats.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

SR Shanmugam has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	SR Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	SR Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	SR Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	SR Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	SR Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	SR Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	SR Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	SR Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Housing and Development Act	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	SR Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

SR Shanmugam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shan & Co	1 cases	100% of cases	Salbiah Bte Adnan v Micro Credit: Caveat Removal & Moneylender's Interest in HDB Sale Proceeds(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of SR Shanmugam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of SR Shanmugam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Salbiah Bte Adnan v Micro Credit: Caveat Removal & Moneylender's Interest in HDB Sale Proceeds 25 Nov 2014 Micro Credit Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2014	Micro Credit Pte Ltd (Defendant): Caveat to be removedThe court ordered that the Caveat lodged by the Defendant against the Property be removed. The Defendant was also ordered to be restrained from lodging further caveats against the Property in respect of the 2nd Loan. No monetary amount was specified.