Srruthi Ilankathir

Srruthi Ilankathir is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Amendment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Interest Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Official Secrecy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Third party proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Srruthi Ilankathir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Srruthi Ilankathir has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	4 cases	57% of cases	Sandy Island Pte Ltd v Thio Keng Thay: Damages for Defects in Construction Contract(Aug 2020) Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: CVD Diamond Patents, Validity, and Infringement(Feb 2020) Cosco Nantong v Logitel: Pre-Action Discovery & Abuse of Process(Nov 2019)
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	43% of cases	ARW v Comptroller of Income Tax: Public Interest Privilege & Discovery in Tax Avoidance Case(Nov 2018) Sunbreeze v Sim Chye Hock Ron: Minority Oppression, Third Party Proceedings, Amendment Application(Oct 2018) Leiman v. Noble Resources: Breach of Contract, Share Options & Fiduciary Duty(Jul 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Srruthi Ilankathir's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.0 parties avg	3.0	57%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	34.3 parties avg	4.3	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	34.3 parties avg	4.3
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Srruthi Ilankathir's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	57,500.00	14,375.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sandy Island Pte Ltd v Thio Keng Thay: Damages for Defects in Construction Contract 27 Aug 2020 Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	27 Aug 2020	Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay respondent costs for the appeal fixed at $50,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: CVD Diamond Patents, Validity, and Infringement 06 Feb 2020 IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	06 Feb 2020	IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant in partSG 508 found invalid and not infringed.
3	Cosco Nantong v Logitel: Pre-Action Discovery & Abuse of Process 28 Nov 2019 Logitel Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendants, Respondent)Lost	28 Nov 2019	Logitel Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendants, Respondent): Application for leave to appeal dismissedDefendants' application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v The Wellness Group Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application for Directors Acting in Own Interests 24 Jun 2019 EQ Capital Investments Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	24 Jun 2019	EQ Capital Investments Ltd (Plaintiff): Winding up order grantedWinding up order granted and costs fixed at S$22,500 plus disbursements to be fixed by the court if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	ARW v Comptroller of Income Tax: Public Interest Privilege & Discovery in Tax Avoidance Case 29 Nov 2018 ARW (Appellant)Lost	29 Nov 2018	ARW (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the High Court judge was dismissed.
6	Sunbreeze v Sim Chye Hock Ron: Minority Oppression, Third Party Proceedings, Amendment Application 21 Oct 2018 Ron Sim Chye Hock (Respondent)Won	21 Oct 2018	Ron Sim Chye Hock (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $35,000 to be paid by the appellants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Leiman v. Noble Resources: Breach of Contract, Share Options & Fiduciary Duty 25 Jul 2018 Noble Group Limited (Defendant)Won	25 Jul 2018	Noble Group Limited (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.