Stanley Lai Tze Chang

Stanley Lai Tze Chang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and pharmaceutical law. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and patents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Patents	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Industrial application	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Food, Drug and Cosmetics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stanley Lai Tze Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Stanley Lai Tze Chang has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & Modularity(Jan 2018) Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty(Jul 2017) Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty in Pharmaceutical Patent Dispute(May 2016)
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	17% of cases	Future Enterprises v McDonald's: Trade Mark Dispute over 'MacCoffee' and 'McCAFÉ'(Mar 2007)
Allen & Glenhill LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	Al Mahamid v Global Tobacco: Trade Mark Invalidation for Cigarette Brand 'Manchester'(Feb 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Stanley Lai Tze Chang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.0 parties avg	2.0	83%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Stanley Lai Tze Chang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	85,000.00	17,000.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & Modularity 04 Jan 2018 ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Jan 2018	ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $85,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty 31 Jul 2017 WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC (Appellant)Lost	31 Jul 2017	WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs to be taxed or agreed, including the costs of and incidental to the application for leave to appeal.
3	Warner-Lambert v Novartis: Patent Amendment, Industrial Application & Novelty in Pharmaceutical Patent Dispute 25 May 2016 WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC (Plaintiff)Lost	25 May 2016	WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to amend the patent was dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Al Mahamid v Global Tobacco: Trade Mark Invalidation for Cigarette Brand 'Manchester' 10 Feb 2015 Global Tobacco Manufacturers (International) Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	10 Feb 2015	Global Tobacco Manufacturers (International) Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Trade Mark InvalidationTrade Mark No. T1208253B for “Manchester and M device” registered in Class 34 in the name of the Defendant is declared invalid under s 23(3)(a)(i) read with s 8(2)(b) of the Act. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Asia Pacific Publishing v Pioneers & Leaders: Copyright Infringement and Passing Off Dispute 26 Jul 2011 Asia Pacific Publishing Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	26 Jul 2011	Asia Pacific Publishing Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The Appellant is entitled to damages against the Respondent for groundlessly threatening the Appellant with copyright infringement under s 200(1) of the Act (which shall be assessed by an assistant registrar), and an injunction restraining the Respondent from making further threats against the Appellant in respect of the subject matter of these proceedings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Future Enterprises v McDonald's: Trade Mark Dispute over 'MacCoffee' and 'McCAFÉ' 27 Mar 2007 Future Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	27 Mar 2007	Future Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).