Stephanie Tan

Stephanie Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and employment law. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Stephanie Tan has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Parol Evidence Rule	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Meetings Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Management Councils	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Stephanie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Stephanie Tan has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ascendant Legal LLC	3 cases	43% of cases	EFG Bank AG v Surewin Worldwide: Costs Allocation After Security Interest Ruling(Jan 2022) Chan Sze Ying v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2948: Adjournment of AGM & Election of Management Council(Apr 2020) Marken Limited (Singapore Branch) v Scott Ohanesian: Breach of Contract of Service & Termination Without Notice(Oct 2017)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	29% of cases	Tong Guan Teck v DBS Bank: Guarantee, Summary Judgment, and Duty of Care(Apr 2012) AYL v AYM: Appeal Against Variation Orders on Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance(Mar 2012)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	1 cases	14% of cases	Maniach Pte Ltd v L Capital Jones Ltd: Minority Oppression & Arbitrability(Apr 2016)
UniLegal LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Lee Tat Development v Management Corp: Dispute over Right of Way & Malicious Prosecution(Feb 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Stephanie Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	29%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Stephanie Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Neutral	2(29%)	29%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	EFG Bank AG v Surewin Worldwide: Costs Allocation After Security Interest Ruling 30 Jan 2022 EFG Wealth Solutions (Singapore) Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	30 Jan 2022	EFG Wealth Solutions (Singapore) Ltd (Defendant): Not entitled to recover costsThe third defendant shall not be entitled to recover any of its costs or disbursements of or incidental to this action from the second defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Chan Sze Ying v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2948: Adjournment of AGM & Election of Management Council 28 Apr 2020 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2948 (Defendant)Won	28 Apr 2020	The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2948 (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication against the defendant was dismissed.
3	Marken Limited (Singapore Branch) v Scott Ohanesian: Breach of Contract of Service & Termination Without Notice 19 Oct 2017 Scott Ohanesian (Defendant)Won	19 Oct 2017	Scott Ohanesian (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant, Scott Ohanesian.
4	Maniach Pte Ltd v L Capital Jones Ltd: Minority Oppression & Arbitrability 21 Apr 2016 Maniach Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Apr 2016	Maniach Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for stay of proceedings dismissedPlaintiff successfully opposed the defendant's application to stay the proceedings in favour of arbitration.
5	Lee Tat Development v Management Corp: Dispute over Right of Way & Malicious Prosecution 11 Feb 2015 Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	11 Feb 2015	Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to strike out not grantedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff’s action dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Tong Guan Teck v DBS Bank: Guarantee, Summary Judgment, and Duty of Care 04 Apr 2012 Tong Guan Teck (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	04 Apr 2012	Tong Guan Teck (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to grant conditional leave to defend was dismissed.
7	AYL v AYM: Appeal Against Variation Orders on Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance 22 Mar 2012 AYM (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	22 Mar 2012	AYM (Respondent, Plaintiff): Orders UpheldVariation orders in her favor upheld; AYL's appeal dismissed. Costs to be taxed if not agreed.