Stephanie Yeo

Stephanie Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in ad hoc admission and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Indian Contract Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Stephanie Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Stephanie Yeo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Harish Salve v BPW: Ad Hoc Admission for Foreign Counsel in ICC Arbitration Dispute(Jan 2018) Re Harish Salve: Ad Hoc Admission for Indian Law Expertise in Arbitration Award Challenge(Feb 2017) MF Global Singapore v Vintage Bullion: Proprietary Claims in Liquidation(Jun 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Stephanie Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	50%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Stephanie Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	8,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Harish Salve v BPW: Ad Hoc Admission for Foreign Counsel in ICC Arbitration Dispute 24 Jan 2018 Harish Salve (Appellant, Applicant)Won	24 Jan 2018	Harish Salve (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeals, reversing the High Court's decision to dismiss the applications for ad hoc admission.
2	Re Harish Salve: Ad Hoc Admission for Indian Law Expertise in Arbitration Award Challenge 16 Feb 2017 Harish Salve (Applicant)Lost	16 Feb 2017	Harish Salve (Applicant): Application DismissedApplications dismissed with costs fixed at $8,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	MF Global Singapore v Vintage Bullion: Proprietary Claims in Liquidation 24 Jun 2015 Vintage Bullion DMCC (In its own capacity, and for and on behalf of and as representative of all customers of MF Global Singapore Pte Limited (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) who have LFX Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) and/or Bullion Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) (Defendant)Lost	24 Jun 2015	Vintage Bullion DMCC (In its own capacity, and for and on behalf of and as representative of all customers of MF Global Singapore Pte Limited (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) who have LFX Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) and/or Bullion Claims for Profit (as defined in the Originating Summons filed herein) (Defendant): LostJudgment in favor of the Liquidators on the substantive issues.
4	Airtrust v Kao Chai-Chau: Illegality & Indemnity in Joint Tortfeasorship 13 Feb 2014 Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	13 Feb 2014	Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed for the commencement of third party proceedings.