Subashini d/o Narayanasamy

Subashini d/o Narayanasamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and shipping. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Liens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bareboat charterparties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Practice and procedure of action in rem	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial sale of vessel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ownership of vessels	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Freezing Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ostensible Authority	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Piercing corporate veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insider reverse piercing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bareboat Charter	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Redelivery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Delivery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Subashini d/o Narayanasamy has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haridass Ho & Partners	6 cases	100% of cases	Meck Petroleum DMCC v Owner of VICTOR 1: Admiralty Claim & Demise Charter After Judicial Sale(Jun 2024) EFA RET Management v. Dinesh Pandey: Bankruptcy - Statutory Demand & Bankruptcy Order Dispute(Mar 2022) Godhwani v Godhwani: Breach of Trust & Misappropriation of Inheritance Funds(Jul 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Subashini d/o Narayanasamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Lost	43.2 parties avg	3.2	67%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Subashini d/o Narayanasamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(14%)	14%
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	157,500.00	31,500.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Meck Petroleum DMCC v Owner of VICTOR 1: Admiralty Claim & Demise Charter After Judicial Sale 27 Jun 2024 Meck Petroleum DMCC (Claimant)Partial	27 Jun 2024	Meck Petroleum DMCC (Claimant): Appeal Dismissed in PartMeck was to pay Savory $3,000.00 (all-in) as costs below. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	EFA RET Management v. Dinesh Pandey: Bankruptcy - Statutory Demand & Bankruptcy Order Dispute 09 Mar 2022 Dinesh Pandey (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	09 Mar 2022	Dinesh Pandey (Defendant, Plaintiff): Application Dismissed; Bankruptcy Order GrantedApplication to set aside statutory demand was dismissed and a bankruptcy order was made against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Godhwani v Godhwani: Breach of Trust & Misappropriation of Inheritance Funds 21 Jul 2020 Florenza Investments Inc (Defendant)Dismissed	21 Jul 2020	Florenza Investments Inc (Defendant): Claim dismissedThe court made no order with respect to the transfers listed at paras 14A, 14B and 15 of the Statement of Claim. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
4	Marty Ltd v Hualon Corp: Arbitration Agreement, Repudiation & Waiver 09 Oct 2018 Hualon Corporation (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (receiver and manager appointed) (Respondent)Lost	09 Oct 2018	Hualon Corporation (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (receiver and manager appointed) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, meaning the respondent lost.
5	Winplus Corp v Frumentarius: Admiralty Jurisdiction & Bareboat Charter Termination 17 Feb 2015 Winplus Corporation Co, Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	17 Feb 2015	Winplus Corporation Co, Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed against the Assistant Registrar’s decision to set aside the in rem writ.
6	STX Corp v Jason Surjana Tanuwidjaja: Contempt of Court for Non-Disclosure of Assets 12 Mar 2014 Yan Pratama Adisaputra (Defendant)Lost	12 Mar 2014	Yan Pratama Adisaputra (Defendant): Found in contempt of courtFound in contempt of court and fined $12,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.