Subramaniam Sundaran

Subramaniam Sundaran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in automobile accidents and road traffic accident law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Subramaniam Sundaran has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subramaniam Sundaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Subramaniam Sundaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subramaniam Sundaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subramaniam Sundaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramaniam Sundaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subramaniam Sundaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subramaniam Sundaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Subramaniam Sundaran has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bogaars & Din	1 cases	100% of cases	Cai Xiao Qing v Leow Fa Dong: Negligence, Road Accident, Cyclist, Zebra Crossing(Mar 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Subramaniam Sundaran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Subramaniam Sundaran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cai Xiao Qing v Leow Fa Dong: Negligence, Road Accident, Cyclist, Zebra Crossing 28 Mar 2012 Leow Fa Dong (by his next friend Leow Chye Huat) (Respondent)Lost	28 Mar 2012	Leow Fa Dong (by his next friend Leow Chye Huat) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with increased contributory negligence. The appellant’s share of blame for the accident is reduced by 20% to 70%, while the respondent’s contributory negligence is increased by 20% to 30% to reflect the fact that he collided into her vehicle, notwithstanding the fact that appellant should have but failed to notice the respondent’s approach and stop in time. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.