Subramanian A Pillai

Subramanian A Pillai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pari passu principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Subramanian A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Subramanian A Pillai has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
ACIES Law Corporation	3 cases	50% of cases	Bahtera Offshore v Sim Kok Beng: Setting Aside Mareva Injunction for Non-Disclosure(Aug 2009) Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria: Jurisdiction over Foreign Immovable Properties in Trust Claim(Nov 2008) Murakami v Wiryadi: Foreign Judgment Enforcement & Limitation in Estate Dispute(Aug 2007)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	17% of cases	Hsing Mei Construction v Lim Check Meng: Default Judgment, Setting Aside, and Loan Dispute(Apr 2000)
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	International Research Corp PLC v Lufthansa Systems: Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute(Oct 2013)
ACIES Law Corpoartion	1 cases	17% of cases	Hitachi v Eltraco: Direct Payment to Subcontractors & Scheme of Arrangement(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Subramanian A Pillai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	33.5 parties avg	3.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2007	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Subramanian A Pillai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	168,520.00	28,086.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	International Research Corp PLC v Lufthansa Systems: Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute 17 Oct 2013 International Research Corp PLC (Appellant)Won	17 Oct 2013	International Research Corp PLC (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine and/or adjudicate upon the dispute between the Appellant and the Respondent arising out of the Supplemental Agreements. Disbursements and fees paid in the arbitration were to be indemnified by the Respondent. The costs of the arbitration were to be paid to the Appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Bahtera Offshore v Sim Kok Beng: Setting Aside Mareva Injunction for Non-Disclosure 02 Aug 2009 Intraline Resources Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Won	02 Aug 2009	Intraline Resources Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Application allowedDefendants’ application in Summons No. 1154 of 2009 to set aside the ex parte Mareva injunction obtained on 12 February 2009 allowed. Costs for this application were ordered at $500 to the Defendants. Costs and disbursements of Defendants’ application for the setting aside were fixed at $4,000 to be paid by the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria: Jurisdiction over Foreign Immovable Properties in Trust Claim 11 Nov 2008 Murakami Takako (Appellant)Lost	11 Nov 2008	Murakami Takako (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs; the Judge’s decision to disallow the appellant’s application to include the Claims in her statement of claim is affirmed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Murakami v Wiryadi: Foreign Judgment Enforcement & Limitation in Estate Dispute 29 Aug 2007 Murakami Takako (Appellant)Lost	29 Aug 2007	Murakami Takako (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Hitachi v Eltraco: Direct Payment to Subcontractors & Scheme of Arrangement 05 Oct 2003 Eltraco International Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	05 Oct 2003	Eltraco International Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the Respondent with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Hsing Mei Construction v Lim Check Meng: Default Judgment, Setting Aside, and Loan Dispute 27 Apr 2000 Lim Check Meng (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	27 Apr 2000	Lim Check Meng (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartJudgment against the defendant for the sum of $159,520 was set aside with leave to file his defence provided he furnished a bank’s guarantee or some suitable security in the said sum (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).