Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai

Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and strata title law. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building Management	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Family Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	4 cases	50% of cases	Sit Kwong Lam v Management Corporation: Strata Title, Common Property Dispute(Mar 2018) Sit Kwong Lam v MCST Plan No 2645: Strata Titles, Common Property, By-Laws Dispute(Mar 2017) Official Assignee v Tay Lee Kiang: Misrepresentation and Conspiracy in Share Sale(Nov 2013)
CNPLaw LLP	2 cases	25% of cases	Lim Bee Lan v Lee Juan Loong: Fraudulent & Negligent Misrepresentation in ABT Investment(Oct 2021) Changi Makan v Development 2003: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Property Sale(Feb 2020)
ACIES Law Corporation	2 cases	25% of cases	Smith Brian Walker v Foo Moo Chye Julie: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce(Oct 2009) Clarke Quay Pte Ltd v Tan Hun Ling: Landlord's Duty to Maintain Exhaust Duct After Restaurant Fire(Jun 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	54.5 parties avg	4.5	63%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Subramanian S/O Ayasamy Pillai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(13%)	13%
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	5(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	338,535.09	48,362.167 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Bee Lan v Lee Juan Loong: Fraudulent & Negligent Misrepresentation in ABT Investment 13 Oct 2021 Lim Bee Lan (Plaintiff)Won	13 Oct 2021	Lim Bee Lan (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedJudgment for the Plaintiff; the Defendants are to pay the Plaintiff the sum of S$298,535.09, which is the difference between the sum invested by the Plaintiff for 5% of ABT shares and the actual value of those shares at the time of investment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Changi Makan v Development 2003: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Property Sale 06 Feb 2020 Changi Makan Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	06 Feb 2020	Changi Makan Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendants was dismissed.
3	Sit Kwong Lam v Management Corporation: Strata Title, Common Property Dispute 04 Mar 2018 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent)Won	04 Mar 2018	MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and costs of the appeal awarded to the Respondent fixed at $40,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Sit Kwong Lam v MCST Plan No 2645: Strata Titles, Common Property, By-Laws Dispute 26 Mar 2017 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2017	MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Official Assignee v Tay Lee Kiang: Misrepresentation and Conspiracy in Share Sale 10 Nov 2013 Tay Teng Joo (Defendant)Won	10 Nov 2013	Tay Teng Joo (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff's claim against the Defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Title & Final Payment 14 Jul 2011 Maria Ng (Appellant, Respondent)Won	14 Jul 2011	Maria Ng (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Ngs' appeal was allowed, and they were awarded costs of the appeals and of the trial below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Smith Brian Walker v Foo Moo Chye Julie: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce 28 Oct 2009 Foo Moo Chye Julie (Respondent)Partial	28 Oct 2009	Foo Moo Chye Julie (Respondent): Orders variedOrders varied; division of matrimonial assets and maintenance orders varied in favor of the respondent.
8	Clarke Quay Pte Ltd v Tan Hun Ling: Landlord's Duty to Maintain Exhaust Duct After Restaurant Fire 28 Jun 2006 Tan Hun Ling (trading as Sin Lok Cuisine) (Respondent)Lost	28 Jun 2006	Tan Hun Ling (trading as Sin Lok Cuisine) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent was found to be solely liable for the plaintiff’s loss.