Sudhershen Hariram

Sudhershen Hariram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in matrimonial assets and family law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in maintenance and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Maintenance	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sudhershen Hariram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sudhershen Hariram has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	4 cases	100% of cases	XBO v XBP: Testamentary Capacity & Validity of 2012 Will Dispute(Oct 2024) CLD v CLE: Determining the Operative Date for Matrimonial Assets Division in Divorce Proceedings(Jun 2021) VGY v VGZ: Striking Out Portions of Affidavit of Assets and Means in Ancillary Matters Proceedings(Mar 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sudhershen Hariram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sudhershen Hariram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	XBO v XBP: Testamentary Capacity & Validity of 2012 Will Dispute 08 Oct 2024 XBP (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	08 Oct 2024	XBP (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for pronouncement in solemn form that the 2011 Will is the last true will and the grant of letters of administration with will annexed in her favour is dismissed.
2	CLD v CLE: Determining the Operative Date for Matrimonial Assets Division in Divorce Proceedings 01 Jun 2021 CLE (Respondent)Partial	01 Jun 2021	CLE (Respondent): Operative date for determining the pool of matrimonial assets set as 7 May 2017The court determined the operative date for the pool of matrimonial assets to be 7 May 2017. The respondent was ordered to pay costs to the applicant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	VGY v VGZ: Striking Out Portions of Affidavit of Assets and Means in Ancillary Matters Proceedings 03 Mar 2020 VGZ (Respondent, Defendant)Won	03 Mar 2020	VGZ (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the District Judge's decision to strike out portions of the Husband's 2nd Affidavit of Assets and Means was dismissed.
4	Hyflux Ltd v SM Investments Pte Ltd: Striking Out Counterclaim & Summary Determination of Restructuring Agreement 02 Oct 2019 SM Investments Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	02 Oct 2019	SM Investments Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim can be raised as a defence without leave of Court. Leave is granted to pursue remedies beyond a pure defence, but no execution of any judgment is to occur without leave while the moratorium is in place.