Sue-Ann Li

Sue-Ann Li is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and theft. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sue-Ann Li has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and theft.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sue-Ann Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sue-Ann Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sue-Ann Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sue-Ann Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sue-Ann Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sue-Ann Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sue-Ann Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sue-Ann Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sue-Ann Li has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ravindran Associates	1 cases	50% of cases	P. T. Swakarya Indah Busana v Haniffa: Trade Mark Invalidation for Bad Faith Registration(Mar 2012)
ATMD Bird & Bird LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Aam Usup v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Theft as Domestic Worker(Oct 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sue-Ann Li's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sue-Ann Li's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	P. T. Swakarya Indah Busana v Haniffa: Trade Mark Invalidation for Bad Faith Registration 29 Mar 2012 P. T. Swakarya Indah Busana (Plaintiff)Won	29 Mar 2012	P. T. Swakarya Indah Busana (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared the defendant's trademarks invalid and ordered the defendants to pay costs to the plaintiff on the standard basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Aam Usup v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Theft as Domestic Worker 05 Oct 2009 Aam Usup (Appellant)Lost	05 Oct 2009	Aam Usup (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.