Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas

Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and conspiracy by unlawful means. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Involuntary Bailment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ignatius J & Associates	4 cases	100% of cases	Tan Cheng Cheng v Shamlal: Conversion & Estate Admin of Richard Mille Watch(Jul 2024) Cradle Wealth Solutions v MTN Consultants: Enforcing Settlement Agreement & Sham Defense(Oct 2023) Prime Cars Leasing v Zenith Automobile: Breach of Director's Duties & Conspiracy(Nov 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	25%
Won	35.0 parties avg	5.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	25.7 parties avg	5.7
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	390,000.00	130,000.003 cases	3
USD	8,000,000.00	8,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Cheng Cheng v Shamlal: Conversion & Estate Admin of Richard Mille Watch 11 Jul 2024 Shamlal s/o Tuppani Bisaysar (Respondent)Won	11 Jul 2024	Shamlal s/o Tuppani Bisaysar (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent; costs of the appeal to be paid by the appellants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Cradle Wealth Solutions v MTN Consultants: Enforcing Settlement Agreement & Sham Defense 26 Oct 2023 Nazarisham bin Mohamed Isa (Defendant)Lost	26 Oct 2023	Nazarisham bin Mohamed Isa (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendants are ordered to pay Cradle Wealth the sum of US$4,000,000.00 plus pre- and post-judgment interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the Writ (ie, 24 August 2020), with costs to be agreed or taxed.
3	Prime Cars Leasing v Zenith Automobile: Breach of Director's Duties & Conspiracy 18 Nov 2021 Lim Siew Ling (Defendant)Partial	18 Nov 2021	Lim Siew Ling (Defendant): Claim dismissed in part; counterclaim dismissedClaim against Lim Siew Ling dismissed in part; counterclaim dismissed. Ordered to return $158,678.70 to PCL. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Yim Lok Foong Elsie v Asia First Star Capital: Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy, and Contract Breach 28 Jun 2021 Yim Lok Foong Elsie (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2021	Yim Lok Foong Elsie (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $390,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).