Sundraresh Menon

Sundraresh Menon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sundraresh Menon has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and asset recovery.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sundraresh Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sundraresh Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sundraresh Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sundraresh Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sundraresh Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sundraresh Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sundraresh Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Gas Supply Agreement	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sundraresh Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sundraresh Menon has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Sui Southern Gas v Habibullah Coastal Power: Gas Supply Agreement Dispute(Feb 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sundraresh Menon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sundraresh Menon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sui Southern Gas v Habibullah Coastal Power: Gas Supply Agreement Dispute 22 Feb 2010 Habibullah Coastal Power Co (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Feb 2010	Habibullah Coastal Power Co (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Award UpheldThe arbitration award in favor of the defendant was upheld, with costs to be paid by the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment was delivered in Singapore.