Sunil S Gill

Sunil S Gill is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in employment law and civil procedure. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sunil S Gill has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Sunil S Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sunil S Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sunil S Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sunil S Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sunil S Gill has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sunil S Gill has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sunil S Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sunil S Gill has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sunil S Gill has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Lim and Partners	2 cases	100% of cases	Tullett Prebon v Chua Leong Chuan: Interlocutory Injunction for Breach of Employment Contract(Aug 2005) Essar Steel Ltd v Bayerische Landesbank: Appeal on Costs & Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal(May 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sunil S Gill's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.8 parties avg	6.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2005	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sunil S Gill's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	3,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tullett Prebon v Chua Leong Chuan: Interlocutory Injunction for Breach of Employment Contract 18 Aug 2005 Tan Lee Seng William (Defendant)Lost	18 Aug 2005	Tan Lee Seng William (Defendant): Injunction grantedAn interlocutory injunction was granted against the defendant, restraining him from working for the intervener during his notice period.
2	Essar Steel Ltd v Bayerische Landesbank: Appeal on Costs & Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal 03 May 2004 Essar Steel Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	03 May 2004	Essar Steel Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against order of costs dismissed; costs of the appeal to be paid by the plaintiff on an indemnity basis fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).