Sunil Singh Panoo

Sunil Singh Panoo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in casinos and gambling and family law. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and casinos and gambling.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unreasonable Behaviour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sunil Singh Panoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sunil Singh Panoo has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dhillon & Partners	3 cases	50% of cases	Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Credit Agreement for Premium Player(Aug 2013) Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Debt & Premium Player Status(Mar 2011) Abe Isaac (Pte) Ltd v Marieta Montalba Pacudan: Lease Agreement Dispute over Property Condition(Mar 2007)
Dhillon & Panoo LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	VUG v VUF: Division of Matrimonial Assets - Applicability of Women's Charter(Jul 2022)
Dhillon and Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Vaswani v Vaswani: Dispute over Insurance Policy Beneficiaries Before Marriage(Feb 2006)
Dhillon Dendroff and Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Vaswani v. Vaswani: Insurance Policy Beneficiaries & Estate Claims(Jun 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sunil Singh Panoo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	33.4 parties avg	3.4	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sunil Singh Panoo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(14%)	14%
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	490,446.44	98,089.295 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VUG v VUF: Division of Matrimonial Assets - Applicability of Women's Charter 19 Jul 2022 VUF (Respondent)Lost	19 Jul 2022	VUF (Respondent): Appeal DismissedWife's share of matrimonial assets reduced as Husband's shares in Company [A] and Company [B] were excluded.
2	Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Credit Agreement for Premium Player 25 Aug 2013 Ong Boon Lin Lester (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2013	Ong Boon Lin Lester (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the Defendant for the Principal Amount of $240,868.00, default interest on the Principal Amount of $240,868.00 at the contractual rate of 12% per annum calculated from 15 August 2010 until the date of receipt of full payment by the Plaintiff; and costs to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Debt & Premium Player Status 29 Mar 2011 Ong Boon Lin Lester (Defendant)Neutral	29 Mar 2011	Ong Boon Lin Lester (Defendant): Leave to defend granted upon conditionLeave to defend granted upon the condition that the defendant pay into court, or provide security by way of a banker’s guarantee, the full amount of the claim (ie the sum of $240,868.00 with interest on the said sum at the annual rate of 12% from 14 August 2010 until 25 March 2011 (without prejudice to the plaintiff’s claimed sums as stated in its pleadings)), by 26 April 2011, failing which the plaintiff would be at liberty to enter final judgment against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Abe Isaac (Pte) Ltd v Marieta Montalba Pacudan: Lease Agreement Dispute over Property Condition 29 Mar 2007 Ong Choo Pang (Defendant)Dismissed	29 Mar 2007	Ong Choo Pang (Defendant): Claims DismissedPlaintiff’s claims against the 2nd defendant are dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Vaswani v Vaswani: Dispute over Insurance Policy Beneficiaries Before Marriage 14 Feb 2006 Lalitabai w/o Lalchand Vaswani (Respondent)Won	14 Feb 2006	Lalitabai w/o Lalchand Vaswani (Respondent): Successful in defending appealThe court declared that the insurer is discharged from its liability under the respective policies if the insurer pays the policy moneys under the First Policy to the father and under the Second and Third Policies to both the parents.
6	Vaswani v. Vaswani: Insurance Policy Beneficiaries & Estate Claims 28 Jun 2005 Lalitabai w/o Vaswani Lalchand (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2005	Lalitabai w/o Vaswani Lalchand (Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed in favor of the Plaintiff. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.