Sunita Carmel Netto

Sunita Carmel Netto is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and fraud and deceit.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Nuisance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Premises Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sunita Carmel Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sunita Carmel Netto has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ang & Partners	3 cases	75% of cases	Mullaichelvan v Lee: Assessment of Damages for Road Traffic Accident Injuries(Jan 2013) DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Discovery & Particulars Dispute on Loan Default & Misrepresentation(Jul 2010) Hwa Lai Heng Ricky v DBS Bank: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages(Feb 2010)
ComLaw LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Danny Raj v Ang Zhiqiang: Negligence and Public Nuisance Claim for Motorcycle Collision on SLE(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sunita Carmel Netto's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sunita Carmel Netto's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	741,795.84	370,897.922 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Danny Raj v Ang Zhiqiang: Negligence and Public Nuisance Claim for Motorcycle Collision on SLE 13 Feb 2022 Ang Zhiqiang (Defendant)Won	13 Feb 2022	Ang Zhiqiang (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant; the plaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Mullaichelvan v Lee: Assessment of Damages for Road Traffic Accident Injuries 20 Jan 2013 Lee Heng Kah (Defendant)Lost	20 Jan 2013	Lee Heng Kah (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be paid to the Plaintiff in the amount of $741,795.84 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Discovery & Particulars Dispute on Loan Default & Misrepresentation 20 Jul 2010 Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Defendant)Neutral	20 Jul 2010	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Defendant): No specific outcome mentioned for this party in this judgment extract.No specific outcome mentioned for this party in this judgment extract.
4	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky v DBS Bank: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages 21 Feb 2010 Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Appellant)Partial	21 Feb 2010	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part to the extent that judgment be given for the Respondent to the extent of 30 per cent of its claim against the Appellant, and that the Appellant be granted leave to defend the remaining 70 per cent of the same.